Collective noun for historians: an argumentation.
One of the consequences of having a Mt. TBR that is just short of keeping me awake at night (both literally and figuratively speaking) is that there are few times I’m really waiting for a book to be published, because I have at least twenty (or a hundred) that are constantly screaming for my attention. However, An Argumentation of Historians was one of those few books, that I immediately bought on release day and I dropped all the rest so I could read it.
St Mary’s is one of my favorite series. It is so light and British I find it the ultimate way to relax. Luckily the tone of this book is lighter compared to the previous one, and I enjoyed it much more. (Apparently Jodi Taylor received much complains about And the Rest is History, because she mentions it in her introduction). If you ever wanted to know what people get up to when they are ‘investigating major historical events in contemporary time’ read this series (this is book #9 and they should really be read in order). Don’t bother with the science though, you will find very little of that, which is just fine because it is their not having an idea what they’re doing that’s at least half the fun of it. Additionally, it makes their responses when they historian better. Oh, and if you can’t stand tea, stay wide from this series, because you will be reminded about it every second page or so.
This all being said and done, it is not all gold that glitters of course. There were some things I didn’t like, so the next part will contain some spoilers for this book and the previous ones in the series.
After ATRIH I was pissed off, because she pulled the ‘assuming someone was dead’ again, and it is just such a cheap plot point. So I was glad she stayed far away from that in this one (even though it was clear from the start that Max would eventually return to the right St. Mary’s). Which was really good, because in a fit of rage I might have declared to throw the entire series out of the window. See, I’ve certainly learned from the impulsiveness of everyone at St. Mary’s. As I mentioned above, there is not a lot of scientific explanation to the workings of the time travel, but apparently it can’t be that hard, since there are enough rogue time travellers to keep an full police force going. Also, the moments it bordered more on science fiction were some of the weakest in the series, in my opinion. Ellis’ explanation of the future, with the Time Police’s involvement in almost all things, was really bad. It would have better been left out. Finally, I feel the Ronan storyline should have ended some time ago. It feels rather repetitive at this point and I think there would be more than enough nice, interesting historical events to explore without him.
I see a new short story is due in 10 days, I can’t wait!
An Argumentation of Historians (The Chronicles of St. Mary’s #9) – Jodi Taylor
Leave a Reply